Compare companion robots side by side
Sticker price is only one part of the decision. Put 2–4 robots next to each other, choose a 1-, 3- or 5-year horizon, and see how required memberships or paid AI conversation change the ownership picture alongside camera use, offline behavior, cloud dependence, mobility, target user and current availability.
Build your comparison
Choose any 2–4 models, then model the ownership horizon you actually care about. The robots, horizon and conversation-plan scenario stay in the URL so you can share or revisit the same decision.
Loading comparison data…
All 28 robots at a glance
The full dataset is useful when you have not narrowed the shortlist yet. Open a robot profile for source notes and buying caveats.
| Robot | Upfront* | Recurring* | Movement | Camera | Offline/local | Cloud dependence | Best fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading robot dataset… | |||||||
*Prices are a dated research snapshot, may be sale prices, may exclude tax/shipping, and vary by country. “No required plan identified” does not mean zero future cloud cost or guaranteed lifetime service.
What the side-by-side view is designed to reveal
Required ownership cost and optional feature cost are separated. ElliQ-style required service fees are projected across the horizon you choose. Paid conversation can be switched on as a separate scenario for feature-gated products such as Vector or Mia, while unrelated optional content plans remain excluded instead of being silently added.
Privacy is not reduced to one marketing score. Camera presence, offline/local behavior and cloud dependence are shown as separate decision factors because a tactile offline companion and a sensor-rich connected robot create fundamentally different trade-offs.
Availability stays visible. Out-of-stock products can still be useful reference points, but the comparison tells you when the official store status in the research snapshot makes immediate purchase uncertain.
High-intent direct comparisons
Loona Deskmate vs Loona Petbot Loona vs Vector vs EMO Miko Mini vs Miko 3
How to read the scores
Offline/local is our editorial classification of how much useful interaction appears to remain without internet-connected services. Cloud dependence estimates how much of the differentiated value relies on vendor-hosted services. These are not manufacturer ratings and they are not predictions that a service will shut down.
Useful category starting points
Budget personality: Eiliko or Eilik depending how much interaction you want. Desktop productivity companion: Loona Deskmate. Mobile social/family robot: Loona. Local/privacy-first pet style: Ropet KAMOMO. Quiet tactile comfort: Qoobo, Joy for All, metaCat, fufuly or Moflin depending the interaction. Tabletop AI character: Vector or EMO, with very different subscription models. Premium robotic dog: Sony aibo. Senior-specific service: ElliQ. Movable pet/home monitoring: Enabot’s EBO and ROLA lines, subject to current stock.
What is deliberately outside the main ranking?
Region-specific systems such as LOVOT and NICOBO, pre-order projects such as Microduck, developer-oriented platforms such as Reachy Mini, waitlist-only launches and specialist therapeutic robots are tracked separately because they are not directly comparable retail purchases.